questions for DNC chair candidates

In the "Extended Entry" are eighteen questions for candidates for chair of the DNC. Chris Bowers originally suggested creating a list of questions. I also created a dKos diary to discuss the idea.

The list of questions is pretty long. Which questions seem like a lower priority for you?

The format will be to ask the same questions of all candidates that grant interviews. In addition to the time after each question candidates will have six minutes of time they can use to give more in depth answers. The candidates determine how this time is spread.

I'd like to have some time for follow-up questions too. I hate letting someone say something that begs a follow-up and not asking the obvious.

The interviews will be posted online in two ways. One format will be to listen to the interview as it is recorded. The other format will be to have all the candidates respond to the each question back-to-back so the listener gets an apples-to-apples comparison.

  1. Who are you? Why do you want to be chair of the DNC? Why should committee members (delegates?) vote for you? (120 seconds)
  2. What is the most complicated task you've managed? (30 seconds)
  3. What's the most concise way you can describe the duties and responsibilities of the chair of the Democratic National Committee? (30 seconds or less)
  4. What are the interests within the Democratic Party the chair needs to manage? Large donors? Small donors? State party organizations? Congressional Democrats? Media? State Democratic legislative caucuses? Staff members? Governors? Mayors? Who else? How will you integrate all these interests? What will you do differently than is being done now? How will you allocate resources differently? (90 seconds)
  5. What if the Democratic Party bureaucracy resists your changes? How will you deal with resistance to change from within the party? (60 seconds)
  6. What people and interest groups form the coalition known as the Republican Party? What people and interest groups form the coalition known as the Democratic Party? What people and interest groups are the two parties competing over? How are the coalitions that form the two major parties changing? (210 seconds)
  7. What is the major factor that has kept the Democratic Party from winning in the last two presidential elections and the last six congressional elections? (30 seconds)
  8. How does the Democratic Party organize for elections? How should it organize to be more effective? (60 seconds)
  9. What are the pros and cons of the current presidential nominating process? Which pros are the most important to keep? What cons are the most important to address? (90 seconds)
  10. How much of the party's problems are caused by shortcomings of the party agenda? How much of the problem is communicating the message to the electorate? (90 seconds)
  11. How can Democrats more effectively use the media? (120 seconds)
  12. What role does religion play in U.S. politics? Brad Carson wrote about religiosity in politics being a reaction to modernity. What is it about modernity that makes voters anxious? How should Democrats respond to these anxieties? (60 seconds)
  13. How should the Democratic Party create an agenda? What is the party's national message? To what extent should the party have a national message? (90 seconds)
  14. Consider the attack on September 11th, 2001 as a political event. Compare and contrast it to another major political event like the Cold War, the Civil Rights Movement, World War II, etc. (120 seconds)
  15. What are the top challenges facing the United States and the world in the next decade? (60 seconds)
  16. What is your strategy for achieving verifiable voting? Should this be the top legislative priority for the Democrats? (60 seconds)
  17. Should the Democratic Party advocate for election reforms that reduce or eliminate the zero-sum competition with non-major party candidates, like Instant Runoff Voting, approval voting or Condorcet voting? How should the Democratic Party relate to minor parties? (30 seconds)
  18. Assume you are elected chair of the party. How should Democrats measure your effectiveness as party chair? (30 seconds)


Display:


delegates or members? (none / 0)

Are the Democrats voting for chair delegates or members of the DNC?
Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 11:57:25 AM EST

question ten (none / 0)

I don't like the wording.

Any recommendations?

Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 11:58:07 AM EST

background (none / 0)

I host Collective Interest on WUIC, the Internet radio station of the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Sebastian, my co-host, and I did interviews in this format of Illinois U.S. Senate candidates leading up to the March, 2004 primary.

I think the format has promise to provide better coverage than traditional media because it's more in-depth than commercial media and more oriented toward issues than even public radio's coverage of the Senate race.

Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 12:04:05 PM EST

Chris Bowers said this was Blogpac's event (none / 0)

Chris Bowers did not say this was Carl Nyberg's event for Carl Nyberg and Carl Nyberg's associate to have a veto over the questions. Here's what Chris Bowers said...

"Blogpac plans to hold a series of group interviews with prospective candidates for DNC chair over the next few weeks. I want to know what you would like us to ask the candidates."

http://www.mydd.com/story/2004/12/20/153554/77

Looks like Chris said WE would craft the question list, not YOU.

by afs on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 01:02:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Bowers said this was Blogpac's event (none / 0)

If you can convince CB to ask your question great.

These people are public figures. I can ask them for interviews. And they can accept or decline.

Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 01:44:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Bowers said this was Blogpac's event (none / 0)

If you want to have your own seperate candidate forum on your show, ask what you want.

If you want the candidate forum to be a Blogpac endorsed event, you need to ask questions that are generated by the Blogpac community.

by afs on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 02:10:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

BlogPAC endorsement? (none / 0)

Did I ask for an endorsement?
Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 02:11:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Trust me... don't ask. (none / 0)

Do whatever you like on your show. You're going to anyway.

We'll continue the process for creating question lists for Blogpac candidate forums on other thread.

by afs on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 02:44:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Since this is a free country (none / 0)

Since this is a free country, you don't need permission from Chris, afs or me to ask any questions you want to. FWIW, I appreciate your contribution and can't imagine what afs' problem is.

People can get a little possessive of things that don't belong to them. I am sure that if Chris had any objections he is quite capable of voicing them. I have not noticed that either Chris or Jerome are particularly shy about expressing their opinion.

by Gary Boatwright on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 05:44:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Since this is a free country (none / 0)

Chris Bowers asked for questions specifically for a series of blogpac DNC candidate forums a couple of days ago.

Then Carl Nyberg posted his questions making specific reference to the Chris Bowers post about that series of forums. However, at the same time Carl Nyberg references the blogpac forums in this post, he stated he was going to write whatever questions he wished.

So Carl Nyberg is making it look like he's going to throw out the list of questions Chris Bowers asked community members to generate for the Blogpac forums and replace it with a list that Carl Nyberg himself personally approved of.

If Carl was only attempting to generate his own thing for his own show, why put the links to Chris Bowers blogpac forum thread up at all?

by afs on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 06:07:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

footnotes? (none / 0)

Are you familiar with the concept of footnotes?
Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Thu Dec 23, 2004 at 11:10:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

60 total seconds for election fraud?!? (none / 0)

1 60 second question related to voting issues? You have got to be kidding.

20% of Americans, which means very roughly 40% of Democrats believe the last 2 national elections were stolen.

If any less than 1/3 of the total time is spent on voting rights issues, then the question-generation process was tainted, and therefore invalid.

by afs on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 12:17:34 PM EST

Re: 60 total seconds for election fraud?!? (none / 0)

I tried to make the questions be forward looking.

I created the show with Sebastian. We got the time slot. We built the reputation.

If you don't like my questions, you are free to make suggestions. If I agree I will incorporate them. If I don't ask questionns you want to hear answered you can choose not to listen. Or you can do interviews through your own blog or Internet radio show.

What is the point of asking about election problems in Ohio? What will this tell us about what kind of chair the person will be?

Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 12:24:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 60 total seconds for election fraud?!? (none / 0)

Why so snippy?

It was a valid question.

and I agree it is probably better to give them 4 questions and have them answer tehm in depth than a laundry list that will only get short stock answers that will be meaningless.

Particulary on voting fraud, it won't matter how many websites are created or actvists in the field if we are going to always lose at the ballot no matter what.

Besides telling us how to live, think, marry, pray, vote, invest, educate our children and, die, the GOP has done a fine job of getting gov't out of our lives.
by Parker on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 12:31:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

why snippy? (1.00 / 1)

You have got to be kidding.

tainted... therefore invalid.

If one engages in disrespectful dialogue toward me, I'm not inclined to be as nice as I would have been otherwise.

And I will admit that I stereotype the shrill people that talk about election fraud as being emotional and unsophisticated about politics.

Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 01:48:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

You don't want to start with me. (1.00 / 0)

One thing I am not is politically unsophisticated. I will show you that by shredding you point by point if you start up with me.

If you cannot understand why people would question you when Chris Bowers posted that the community would generate the question list for Blogpac DNC candidate events, and now suddenly that has changed and you are claiming you and your associate have the right to generate the question list, then you do not know a whole lot about working with others and group efforts.

by afs on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 02:04:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

here's what I know (1.00 / 1)

I know that shrill, one-issue people make bad teammates.
Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 02:07:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I can out-debate you on the entire platform. (none / 0)

You want to start with me... go for it. I will school you on how to use real evidence from excellent sources you can find on the net to disprove flawed argumentation.
by afs on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 02:16:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I can out-debate you on the entire platform. (1.00 / 1)

What's the question you think we are debating?
Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 02:19:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Hey, you're the one tossing shrill one issue bombs (1.00 / 0)

You've the one tossing "shrill, one-issue" bombs on this thread. I'm just pointing out that you are either tossing those bombs at someone else, or you are about to be schooled in how wrong you are to toss such bombs at me.
by afs on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 02:24:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

school me (1.00 / 1)


Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 02:27:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Blogpac doesn't need you ruining Blocpac rep. (1.00 / 1)

Are you going to start ranting at Howard Dean, Tim Roemer, or any other candidate like you just ranted at me if they disagree with you on an issue?

If you can't even keep your cool in a blog where you get to slowly type out your responses, we don't need you anywhere near a DNC chair candidates forum mike. You're too short-tempered to be a representative of anyone for anything.

by afs on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 02:42:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

four questions (none / 0)

What four questions would you ask?
Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 01:49:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: four questions (none / 0)

  1. Define your ideology not using terms such as moderate, liberal, centrist or conservative

  2. How would you ensure that everyone eligle can vote and that every vote is counted.

  3. What is the "Message" you would like to define for the party

  4. How would you reconcile the needs of all 50 states and federal elections.

Besides telling us how to live, think, marry, pray, vote, invest, educate our children and, die, the GOP has done a fine job of getting gov't out of our lives.
by Parker on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 05:37:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: four questions (none / 0)

4. "50 states". OK. The candidates are gonna say its a nationwide party and the DNC has responsibility to nurture the health of the party in all 50 states and to be accountable to the state party in all 50 states.

I'm skeptical the question will differentiate the candidates much.

  1. "Message". I don't like asking candidates what the message should be because the job is more about managing how the message is created and disseminated, not deciding the message.

  2. "Every vote counted". I like asking about legislation on this point better. It's more specific and if the candidate has another plan s/he can explain why it's better.

  3. Who cares what the political ideology of the DNC chain is? Do you know the ideology of the McAuliffe? Past party chairs?

Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 07:10:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Nothing more forward looking than counting votes. (none / 0)

What is the point of looking forward if what you are working toward in that future will not matter because the GOP will just steal the next election, too?

I'm telling you this right now. Candidates signing a pledge to fight to count all votes until all legal remedies are exhausted in a recount situation WILL be a HUGE ISSUE in the 2006 and 2008 nomination process. I personally will not support a candidate that doesn't sign such a pledge. There will also be no more situations where a candidate walks away with the national election fraud defense fund and keeps it for personal political usage.

If YOU do not think election fraud is a big deal, that's your right. However, 40% of the party does consider voting rights isues incredibly important, and if you aren't willing to ask questions for all those members of the party, too, then maybe you shouldn't be crafting the question list.

by afs on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 12:37:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

candidate pledge (none / 0)

Say Gore signed such a pledge in 2000, how would that have affected the outcome?

How would such a pledge have affected the 2004 election?

Can you point to a single example of a Congressional candidate giving up a recount fight when s/he had a shot at winning?

Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 01:53:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It almost just happened in WA Gov race. (none / 0)

We raised the funds necessary for the hand recount in WA with only a few hours to spare. Gregoire would have lost if the hand count had not been done.
by afs on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 02:07:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

how would a pledge have made a difference? (none / 0)

And how would her signing or non-signing a pledge would have affected her ability to raise this money?
Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 02:09:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

If Gregoire QUIT after first recount, Rossi wins (none / 0)

Notice I said the pledge was...fight to count all votes until all legal remedies are exhausted in a recount situation.

If Gregoire had quit after the first legally required recount, before all the votes were recounted by hand, then Rossi would be Governor.

by afs on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 02:21:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If Gregoire QUIT after first recount, Rossi wi (none / 0)

Can you point to a single example of a candidate for governor quitting under similar circumstances?

Why would a gubernatorial candidate quit under similar circumstances?

Your analysis that the Democrats are losing because the candidates don't want to win doesn't make much sense. Have you ever been involved in a high-stakes election? Have you ever met a candidate in a high-stakes election that wasn't tremendously invested in the outcome on a personal level?

Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 02:26:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I point at Kerry. (none / 0)

Gore had exhausted most of the legal options he had. I don't know if Gore could have done a lot more, but Kerry conceeded before they even finished doing the first count in several states.

Kerry also walked away with the voting irregularities defense fund that people contributed to this cycle and hasn't spent a dime of it investigating even the documentable election irregularities like minority disenfranchisement. Kerry's got about $14 million that could be getting used right now for real investigations when investigations matter. Instead, he turned that money into a personal PAC.

by afs on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 02:36:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

just to be clear (none / 0)

Just to be clear, you don't have an example from a single Congressional or gubernatorial race, right?

Doesn't this suggest your pledge is a completely moot point in 2006?

Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 02:38:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I just showed it mattered in Pres and a Gov. race (none / 0)

If Gregoire had acted like Kerry, Rossi would be Gov. of WA.

Democrats need certainty that Democratic candidates will act like Gregoire, not Kerry.

by afs on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 02:47:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

only you have it backwards (none / 0)

Actually the Gregoire case shows that your pledge idea doesn't matter. She didn't have to sign a pledge to advocate for her best interests.
Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 03:36:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

No... you just can't admit you're wrong, Carl. (none / 0)

If everyone had to sign a "Gregoire" pledge this year, Kerry would have been forced to stay in the fight this year and the media would have been forced to spotlight all the voting irregularities around the country.

No pledges means more Kerry behavior, and more votes uncounted.

by afs on Wed Dec 22, 2004 at 03:43:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.